60W), and my system is only 6 core ( Thuban 1100T) so, i guess it is worth it if someone needs the power. Well, doing normal tasks i consume ~220-230W including my LG W2600HP monitor (appr. Hope that helps.Yeap, i forgot to quote in my reply. around 230w to 260w just doing normal windows stuff (all CPU cores running at full 2.5 GHz under very little load). i only got her going yesterday so i've got her dialed in for minimal power consumption yet. so i'm going to guess brief spikes to 750w when i get all four CPUs in there and going full bore. Each CPU seems to take around 125w or so. That *should* cut down on the noise as well because from what i understand the fans on the newer PSUs throttle based on temperature. i will be swapping it for a newer platinum rated 1400w PSU from the latest revision SC748 case. The SuperMicro case i am using is vintage 2008 i think, and so came with less efficient dual redundant 1000w power supplies (of which i am using only one). This is with windows set to performance power mode. Keep in mind that includes the LCD monitor as well (which is 15w?). This version includes 8.00 MB of 元 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Our products are designed to be high-performing, stylish, and suited for any lifestyle. It run at 4.20 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 125 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. Shop Mohawk Flooring to find the perfect floors for any room in your home. yes, if i have all 24 cores going then generally speaking the kill-a-watt meter is telling me that i am pulling around 475 to 515 watts from the wall socket. The AMD FX-8350 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. yes, if i have all 24 cores going then generally speaking the kill-a-watt meter is telling me that i am pulling around 475 to 515 watts from the wall socket. The last two (4300/4300) both feature a 95W TDP, and will compete up against the Core i5 series.I think you are talking to me. The sole 6-core CPU will be FX-6300 at 3.5 GHz while the 4-core CPU will be FX-4100 clocked at 3.8 GHz, interesting as for less threaded applications that 4100 would be faster. An 6MB L2 cache here as each core has 1 MB of L2. The fourth and final processor released today is the FX-4300 which will have four CPU cores that are clocked at 3.8 GHz with a 4 GHz Turbo and as you can expect, a 4 MB cache. The FX 8320 will be the same yet with lower clock frequencies, 3.5 GHz on the core and 4 GHz on the turbo.ĭropping down from eight to six cores we find the FX-6300 which will be clocked at a base frequency of 3.5 GHz with Turbo's towards 4.1 GHz. The fastest of the upcoming chips is called the FX-8350 (which we review today) and it sports a base frequency of 4.0 GHz with a maximum Turbo frequency of 4.2GHz, 8MB of Level 2 cache memory, and has a TDP of 125W. This 2nd generation of FX series processors will see four new processors. Two of them featuring eight processing cores while the two other include six and respectively four cores. These processors are all based on the same Vishera Piledriver architecture yet have a different numbers of cores with accompanying cache's, let's recap the four processors that have been launched first: The processors added into the chart are the eight core AMD FX 8320, the six-core AMD FX 6300 and the four core AMD FX 4300. So this article is basically a big performance chart, for the architecture specifications and conclusions we urge you to read our AMD FX 8350 review. This article is nothing more then a performance overview of all four processors released yesterday. Interesting ones as they are eight, six and four core FX processors And though everybody has been focusing on that most high-end AMD FX 8350 processor, another three processors have been released. AMD FX 8350 - 8320 - 63 processors performance analyzedĪMD released the FX series Vishera - Piledriver based processor.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |